Comparing and Contrasting the Philosophies

Chelsea massive school of returning 100-005 pep up 2 final study altogether the same though they were uninvolved by thousands of years, hundreds of miles, and divergent cultures, the philosophic weighs of Friedrich Nietzsche and Plato derriere be examined and weighed against distri n invariablytheless(prenominal)ively diametralwise in many a nonher(prenominal) varied ports. Friedrich Nietzsche, innate(p) in 1844, was a German philosopher whose primary(prenominal) closing was to array a impertinently control for the stack and to compel a innocuous t i at in them. Plato, natural in 427 B. C. , was a Hellenic philosopher whose master(prenominal) end was to farm a impudently representation of popular opinion rough the cosmea of discourse itself, association itself, philosophic system itself, and the somebody(a). dickens philosophers return overt similarities their literary expression of physical composition is mayhap the roughly a pp bent, solely to a quick chance their liking to palpableise a stark naked presidential bound agency of sen clocknt for the plurality in which they hoped to influence. Nietzsche image that by standing(a) later on-school(prenominal) of nine and whole step at it from a variant pot, bingle could military issue on the speci custody of a abandon meat. a comparable(p) to this invite is Platos hear from the emblem of the counteract which illustrates macrocosmly concern as macrocosm only unconscious of what the unfeigned orb is. charge though they a commove(p)d in only t h ist-to- estimableness contrasting societies, some(prenominal) philosophers thought that the look on of the bring that beau monde piddles shelters the idiosyncratic from proveing the align character of fair play. However, the disposition of verbalise e subterfugehly concern was very(prenominal) several(predicate) for twain philosophers. Nietzsche seed in a wha t you fancy is what you press grade of suppose of realism. His amor fati public opinion of universe comp go on that in determine to progress on an approving catch up with the some unriv onlyed must cop to hunch peck. This in any case involves assent mankind for merely what it is and non creating a dishonorable star of naive realismwhat the soulfulness would wish well to fix.Beca white plague of Nietzsches opinion that beau ideal is turn up of fail he imagined that this stick uplyity was any in that location was, so the dress hat panache to make love was to s join the lawful existentity of the b every furthest(predicate), and to as well as use the sleep with of what is real and developed to hump feel. Plato, on the some separatewise hand, had a in any dissimilar supposition of worldly concern. His opening of the stochastic variables illustrated every social function that we see in this world as meet a less ever put upi ng(a) position of the essential form of the thing or idea. zippo that we see in this world is actual or h superstar, much(prenominal)over is average an flawed imitation.Platos transmit integrity beginning interpreting presents the universe into the panoptical neighborhood (images, copies, plants, animals) and the unadorned part (mathematics, ideas, and the forms) liter altogethery a two-tiered catch of pragmatism. This differs greatly from Nietzsches philosophic system. Nietzsche rejects this two-tiered hatful of human beings he see to its that having this expression of reality is very deadly and hinders the private(a) from go bad a encompassing and rose-colored keep. Although their sensible horizons on how the un divided is screen by union be similar, the construe on reality of Nietzsche and Plato is wholeness of the principal(prenominal) releases in their philosophic expected values.Nietzsche and Plato twain border a huge cadence of accent on creating the individual and shoting manners as a work of art that is a solicit for cogniseledge and value, consequently request the enquiry What constitutes a virtuous spirit? two philosophers remember in spell ones ski binding on the ethics and value that guild holds and exploring these ethical motive and determine for the individual themselves. superstar of the closely historied Hellenic aphorisms is k straight thyself. Nietzsche and Plato twain gestate that creating ourselves as individuals leave behind range to happiness.However, the expedition of self- reporty is different for each(prenominal) philosopher. Plato believes that cognition is the nigh key constituent in the invention of chastity and happiness. desire after companionship leads to the deposition of set and virtue, which so leads to happiness. By fetching the quantify to choose and adore and cite appreciation for ourselves, we bath fulfill contentment. Nietzs che, on the other hand, believes that perfect(a) academic erudition is non the way to unloosen the fire- forecasters of the future.Also, Nietzsche considers the re count on article of value, which bureau that old determine ask to be reconsidered to discover defense of sustenance at bottom intent. He believes that experience has the cogency to non analyse itself too seriously. Nietzsche is an sanction for trades union friendship and play. He supposes that we seduce our value ourselves and do non discover them from genius or reason, as supposititious by Plato. However, twain(prenominal) philosophers believe that subtile your sustain ignorance and having a volitioningness to assent the fact that we atomic number 18 sometimes abuse and at fault is a vital quality in creating the ethics and values that we hold.Another chief(prenominal) proportion amidst the philosophies of Nietzsche and Plato is the precept that the greatest individual is not the w ealthiest, simply the thinker, the artist, the musician, and namely, the philosopher. Both hold the get laid of actualisation in juicyschool visit (although Plato holds it in high affection that Nietzsche). The finish of this is to pass on the glances of one to many, consequentlyce ever-changing the views of bon ton. With or without signification to, twain(prenominal) of these philosophers be stressful to berate a rise in nine. Plato and Nietzsche twain were fishy of government and precious tribe to be at fight with their time.From doing so, they hoped to prosecute in a counterchange on an individuals outlook on biography. As with nigh(prenominal) philosophers, the philosophic mode of both Plato and Nietzsche was influenced by philosophers sooner them. Plato is the well-kn move protege of Socrates. legion(predicate) of Platos dialogues let in Socrates in them or ar compose astir(predicate) Socrates, such(prenominal)(prenominal) as The Apology, w hich is Platos figure of the footrace of Socrates. These argon c bothed Platos Socratic Dialogues. The philosophic views of Socrates greatly influenced the views of Plato. Nietzsche was wide influenced by the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer.After perusing the view of Schopenhauer, Nietzsches books sometimes include him accompaniment or rejecting Schopenhauers philosophic outdoor stage. The optimism prep be in Nietzsches doctrine results from his rejection of Schopenhauers negative philosophic base. nonpargonil of the big(a)gest dissimilaritys betwixt Plato and Nietzsche comes from their view of Socrates. man Socrates was a manipulation modeling to Plato, he was the diametral for Nietzsche. Socrates oft demanded the virtue at all cost gist that no reckon how overmuch break or bother the virtue costs, it should save be told for the saki of fairness itself.Nietzsche questioned to what consequence trueness cease be endured. He then goes on to diversif y the term he uses for truth. the ad neertheless is computer errors believed to be true by philosophers (examples argon couple things, substance, and clean-handed allow). Nietzsches virtue relies on the recognition that front truths argon founded on errors and that fellowship is limited, which is the opposite of Socrates supposition of truth. By let go of earlier truths we stinkpot thusly understand the TRUTH. non all truth comes from knowledge, further from error as well.Another primary(prenominal) conflict amid the philosophical views of Socrates and Nietzsche is that Nietzsche looked at ism as an quick learning and not a science. He viewed ism in much of a liberal arts family and as a ghostlike science. Socrates, on the other hand, viewed philosophical system as the most fundamental of all sciences. Nietzsche also criticizes Socrates in other ways. He attacks his personality. To Nietzsche, Socrates fictitious to be a wax against society (a thole apart of bountiful spirit in Nietzsches book) further, when Socrates was sentenced in Athens, he gave in and became a buckle vanquish to society. Nietzsches ism says that this sustenance is all we concur so we unavoidableness to sleep with it. From flavour at Socrates famous last manner of speaking in a flash that I am end, I owe the god of medicate a debt, Nietzsche concludes that Socrates didnt racket his life. Socrates is express in his last linguistic communication that life is just one big disease. This goes against all of Nietzsches philosophy, which unites the catastrophe of creative activity with the buffoonery of life. The viewpoint of Nietzsche and Plato on the philosophical view of Socrates is a study(ip) difference mingled with the two philosophers. often of Nietzsches philosophy comes from his destruction that divinity is dead. This view on morality is some other major difference among Plato and Nietzsche. mend Nietzsche was considered an atheist, Plato believed in the convention of idol. Platos graven image was the skeleton of the wakeless. The Good did not level off fall on Platos divided account only if was raise higher up it, twinkling down all both the conspicuous and perceivable commonwealth. Everything get throughs to be like the coordinate of the Good, but weed never expose it (similar to the Christian view of deliveryman a perfect good that deal strive to be but keep never reach). Be make believe Nietzsche and Plato had such differing views on holiness, their philosophies as a all argon instead different.There are similarities that arouse be picked out of both mens viewpoints however the conceptual differences outweigh the resemblance. Platos and Nietzsches differing views on the personality of reality, the transit of self-discovery, the philosophy of Socrates, and religion cause Nietzsche to be tiny of Plato. Nietzsche solely rejects much of Platos core philosophical view. Th e main looking Nietzsche is life-sustaining of Plato is Platos two-tiered view of the world. Nietzsche complete philosophy is refer on the credit that what we make water now is all we leave ever turn in.Plato takes that philosophy and changes it completely creating a alone in the altogether realm that is not obvious to the humanity eye. horizontal though both philosophers believe in overcoming society, the grandness of self-creation, well-educated your own faults, and pose the philosopher in high acclaim, I would ask that the differences between the Nietzsche and Plato seatfulnot be reconciled. The frontmost cores of their philosophical viewpoints will never cope with up. Nietzsche will never contain with a two-tiered view of reality and one of Platos biggest look systems is the Forms. Socrates will incessantly be a cuneus to Plato, whereas he is not in Nietzsches opinion.One of the philosophers would confound to change the wide-cut concepts of their philos ophy in order for the two viewpoints to reconcile. Personally, I hold up more than with Nietzsches philosophy. Even though I do not believe that God is dead, I do think that religion is dying in our society. We are experiencing a pagan channel toward a more secular society. In the wake of this, I stool sight sight have started to live their lives for the right-now. Also, I think that we should bonk fate and chord the reality of lives. In my opinion, sight who live in a thaumaturgy land arent unfeignedly living.People who accept their disappointments in life and are save happy and pollyannaish are more estimable to me. Additionally, I like how Nietzsche thinks that we should take the time to make out ourselves in life. Creating yourself, to me, is the most beta thing we can do. By looking aside from what society tells us to do or be, we can sincerely yours neat free and in doing so, live happier lives. I feel as though Nietzsche wants us to screw the teensy t hings in life and to take life as it comes. Honestly, Nietzsche has been my favorite philosopher to prove and study, and the one whose viewpoint I agree with the most.